Analisis User Interface Website LMS-AKN Pacitan Menggunakan Metode VISAWI

Candra Budi Susila; Desanty Ridzky; Pradityo Utomo

doi:10.65475/61cvgx05

Authors

Candra Budi Susila Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan Author
Desanty Ridzky Akademi Komunitas Negeri Pacitan Author
Pradityo Utomo Universitas Merdeka Madiun Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65475/61cvgx05

Keywords:

User Interface, Visual Aesthetics, VISAWI, E-Learning, LMS-AKN Pacitan

Abstract

This study evaluates the visual-interface quality of the LMS-AKN Pacitan website through the Visual Aesthetics of Websites Inventory (VISAWI), an instrument built specifically to capture how users perceive a site's visual appeal across four facets: Simplicity, Diversity, Colorfulness, and Craftsmanship. Using a quantitative descriptive design, data were gathered through a questionnaire completed by 39 active students who had used the LMS-AKN Pacitan platform for at least one semester. Findings place the website's overall interface quality in the “good” category, with an aggregate mean score of 3.69 on a five-point Likert scale. Craftsmanship recorded the highest score (3.91), followed by Simplicity (3.87), Diversity (3.55), and Colorfulness (3.42); all four facets fell within the “good” range, suggesting that the interface is straightforward, easy to navigate, and professionally presented. Even so, the comparatively lower Colorfulness and Diversity scores point to room for improvement in color choice and visual variety to further boost user engagement. This study contributes to the growing body of work on digital-learning interface design in higher education and offers practical recommendations for refining the UI toward a more attractive, comfortable, and effective learning experience. Subsequent research is encouraged to pair VISAWI with usability testing and to draw on a larger respondent pool for more generalizable conclusions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Moshagen and M. T. Thielsch, “Facets of visual aesthetics,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 689–709, 2010.

[2] T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky, “Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 269–298, 2004.

[3] G. Lindgaard, G. Fernandes, C. Dudek, and J. Brown, “Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression!,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2006.

[4] M. T. Thielsch and M. Moshagen, “VisAWI – Visual Aesthetics of Websites Inventory,” 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.thielsch.org

[5] J. Nielsen and R. Molich, “Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces,” in Proc. ACM CHI’90 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, 1990, pp. 249–256.

[6] B. Shneiderman, C. Plaisant, M. Cohen, S. Jacobs, and N. Elmqvist, Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016.

[7] M. Moshagen and M. T. Thielsch, “A short version of the visual aesthetics of websites inventory,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1305–1311, 2013.

[8] L. Sadita, H. B. Santoso, L. I. Windrawan, and P. H. Khotimah, “An Indonesian adaption of Visual Aesthetics of Website Inventory (VisAWI) questionnaire for evaluating video game user interface,” in Proc. 2022 Int. Conf. Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications (IC3INA), Virtual Event, Indonesia, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3575882.3575956.

[9] A. Fatmawati, “Evaluasi usability pada Learning Management System OpenLearning menggunakan System Usability Scale,” INOVTEK Polbeng – Seri Informatika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 120–134, 2021, doi: 10.35314/isi.v6i1.1881.

[10] W. H. Rahangmetan and M. N. N. Sitokdana, “Evaluasi usability pada Learning Management System perguruan tinggi menggunakan User Experience Questionnaire,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi (JUKANTI), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 245–254, 2024.

[11] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014.

[12] M. Hassenzahl and N. Tractinsky, “User experience – a research agenda,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2006.

[13] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

[14] R. Likert, “A technique for the measurement of attitudes,” Archives of Psychology, vol. 22, no. 140, pp. 1–55, 1932.

[15] G. Hirschfeld and M. T. Thielsch, “Establishing meaningful cut points for online user ratings,” Ergonomics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 310–320, 2015.

[16] D. N. Amadi, P. Utomo, and A. Budiman, “Design and Build of Road Damage Information System in Madiun Regency Using Web Development Life Cycle Methods,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1112–1125, 2022, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v4i4.412.

[17] I. K. Wardani, P. Utomo, A. Budiman, and D. N. Amadi, “Pemanfaatan Metode Design Thinking dan Pengujian SUS untuk UI/UX Aplikasi Home Care Madiun Berbasis Android,” Journal of Computer and Information Systems Ampera, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 106–125, 2023, doi: 10.51519/journalcisa.v4i2.399.